Well done Ram! Rumble Bee on the way.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
10,161
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4
It may be more advantageous in some situations, but to me, it also adds more weight, more complexity, and increases maintenance.

Besides, I rather like sitting and spinning! ;)

I've driven 4x4 vehicles from model years 1971 to 2021 and have yet to find the maintenance burdensome, the 100-ish lbs to matter in the slightest, or the complexity to be noticeable. I've busted one transfer case, and that was after years of work loads well outside of intended specs in a nearly 25 year old truck.

I get not *needing* it but I think your complaints about it a pretty marginal for real world use with it vs a 2wd.

Spinning Ain't Winning :Big Laugh: :Big Laugh: ;)

Especially in a street truck, which has to overcome the weight distribution that is part of why sports trucks are inherently stupid. Stupid can be fun, not knocking it, but as I'm sure you'd agree you're taking a very square peg trying to get it in a really round hole when you start with a truck vs a sedan or coupe and try to make a road course worthy vehicle or a hard launching dragster.
 

Tray Burge

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2015
Posts
2,752
Reaction score
3,425
Location
On the porch
Ram Year
2003
Engine
5.7 Hemi
Stupid can be fun, not knocking it, but as I'm sure you'd agree you're taking a very square peg trying to get it in a really round hole when you start with a truck vs...
But, Stupid and Fun IS the concept of a muscle truck though?
No sedan will ever look this sexy from the rear. lol
IMG-2658.jpg
 

Lsujker

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2023
Posts
416
Reaction score
687
Location
Baton Rouge
Ram Year
2017
Engine
6.4
Y'all quit using the phase "parts bin". You are only diminishing what the engineers at Ram have done. You ever seen a quad cab with short bed? NO. I'm sure the TRX suspension was heavily modified to get it that low. They finally gave us the 392. The parts they did bring over from the BIN are all well received. I tip my hat.

I'm sure the quad cab alone presented some problems ether in design or an OH CRAP afterwards. You know RAM wanted a luxury interior but don't currently make niceties for the smaller cap.
 

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
10,161
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4
But, Stupid and Fun IS the concept of a muscle truck though?

Exactly what I said.

Y'all quit using the phase "parts bin". You are only diminishing what the engineers at Ram have done. You ever seen a quad cab with short bed? NO. I'm sure the TRX suspension was heavily modified to get it that low. They finally gave us the 392. The parts they did bring over from the BIN are all well received. I tip my hat.

I'm sure the quad cab alone presented some problems ether in design or an OH CRAP afterwards. You know RAM wanted a luxury interior but don't currently make niceties for the smaller cap.

They didn't start with a TRX's long travel suspension and then lower it, that'd be silly. It's the air ride suspension with some shorter springs more than likely.

There's some new pieces. The frame, at least. There's nothing unique about the quad cab vs the crew cab that makes fitting the luxury interior in problematic. The only reason they didn't before was to upsell you. Same reason Ford won't put ventilated seats in the Ranger. It's a marketing decision, not an engineering challenge.

It *is* mostly a parts bin truck. That's not only fine, it's smart. Cheaper to build, cheaper to own, better for long term ownership (and crash repair) if the parts aren't model specific.

This isn't an engineering achievement, it's a corporate philosophy one. A good one.
 
OP
OP
GeauxinUp

GeauxinUp

Senior Member
Navy Badge
Joined
Feb 9, 2025
Posts
760
Reaction score
1,475
Location
Louisiana
Ram Year
2026 Limited
Engine
3.0L TT H.O.
Y'all quit using the phase "parts bin". You are only diminishing what the engineers at Ram have done. You ever seen a quad cab with short bed? NO. I'm sure the TRX suspension was heavily modified to get it that low. They finally gave us the 392. The parts they did bring over from the BIN are all well received. I tip my hat.

I'm sure the quad cab alone presented some problems ether in design or an OH CRAP afterwards. You know RAM wanted a luxury interior but don't currently make niceties for the smaller cap.
Let me know when you buy that s/c 6.2 so I can come down and ride in it!
 

mikeru

Super Moderator
Staff member
Moderator Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2016
Posts
4,483
Reaction score
9,161
Location
Florida
Ram Year
2020 Limited
Engine
Hemi 5.7L non-Etorque
Exactly what I said.



They didn't start with a TRX's long travel suspension and then lower it, that'd be silly. It's the air ride suspension with some shorter springs more than likely.

There's some new pieces. The frame, at least. There's nothing unique about the quad cab vs the crew cab that makes fitting the luxury interior in problematic. The only reason they didn't before was to upsell you. Same reason Ford won't put ventilated seats in the Ranger. It's a marketing decision, not an engineering challenge.

It *is* mostly a parts bin truck. That's not only fine, it's smart. Cheaper to build, cheaper to own, better for long term ownership (and crash repair) if the parts aren't model specific.

This isn't an engineering achievement, it's a corporate philosophy one. A good one.
At the very least they'd need longer control arms because of the wide body. There definitely had to be some engineering involved with the suspension.

Y'all quit using the phase "parts bin". You are only diminishing what the engineers at Ram have done. You ever seen a quad cab with short bed? NO. I'm sure the TRX suspension was heavily modified to get it that low. They finally gave us the 392. The parts they did bring over from the BIN are all well received. I tip my hat.

I'm sure the quad cab alone presented some problems ether in design or an OH CRAP afterwards. You know RAM wanted a luxury interior but don't currently make niceties for the smaller cap.
I don't see the term parts bin as derogatory. Like others have said, it's a smart way of doing something like this if done right. If they just cobbed a bunch of existing parts together to get a product out the door, well, that's another story.
 

Wild one

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Posts
23,817
Reaction score
54,823
Ram Year
14 Sport
Engine
5.7
At the very least they'd need longer control arms because of the wide body. There definitely had to be some engineering involved with the suspension.


I don't see the term parts bin as derogatory. Like others have said, it's a smart way of doing something like this if done right. If they just cobbed a bunch of existing parts together to get a product out the door, well, that's another story.
I wonder if they didn't offset the wide body stance with the tires and rims,instead of the control arms.It does carry the widest tires Ma Mopars ever used excluding the Viper,as the tires are even wider then what's on a wide body Hellcat
 

DILLIGAF

Senior Member
Canadian Forces
Joined
May 28, 2016
Posts
5,773
Reaction score
12,334
Location
Canada
Ram Year
2012
Engine
5.7
Y'all quit using the phase "parts bin". You are only diminishing what the engineers at Ram have done.

Tons of guys have built 6.4 1500s in their backyard. This isnt an engineering marvel at all. :birgits_tiredcoffee

There's way cooler trucks builds on the HiPo Ram FB page built for less money.

Im looking forward to the parts diagrams to show up and see what I can use on my ch!tbox.
 
Last edited:

mikeru

Super Moderator
Staff member
Moderator Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2016
Posts
4,483
Reaction score
9,161
Location
Florida
Ram Year
2020 Limited
Engine
Hemi 5.7L non-Etorque
I wonder if they didn't offset the wide body stance with the tires and rims,instead of the control arms.It does carry the widest tires Ma Mopars ever used excluding the Viper,as the tires are even wider then what's on a wide body Hellcat
Maybe, but only the SRT comes with those 12 inch tires. The other two models will have narrower tires. I certainly hope they aren't making up that 6 inch difference with wheel offset on the base model. We know that all three models will have different suspensions though, so until we actually see them all we can do is speculate on how they achieve that width.
 

Docwagon1776

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Posts
4,735
Reaction score
10,161
Location
Midwest
Ram Year
2012, 2021
Engine
5.7, 6.4
Maybe, but only the SRT comes with those 12 inch tires. The other two models will have narrower tires. I certainly hope they aren't making up that 6 inch difference with wheel offset on the base model. We know that all three models will have different suspensions though, so until we actually see them all we can do is speculate on how they achieve that width.


At about 14:50 he looks at the chassis without a body on it. You can see the suspension there, but I am not well versed enough to know what's samey-same with this air suspension vs the "normal" one. The video guy never talks about it, either.

Brake venting is smart, though, that's something they had to figure out on the early police package Chargers because brake fade was really bad on them.
 

Wild one

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Posts
23,817
Reaction score
54,823
Ram Year
14 Sport
Engine
5.7

At about 14:50 he looks at the chassis without a body on it. You can see the suspension there, but I am not well versed enough to know what's samey-same with this air suspension vs the "normal" one. The video guy never talks about it, either.

Brake venting is smart, though, that's something they had to figure out on the early police package Chargers because brake fade was really bad on them.
The spindles look differant,but to my eyes the upper and lower control arms look alot like what the 5th Gens use.They could shove the tires out with a differant spindle offset,which would also probably give them a better set-up to fit the big brakes onto the front
 

tones2SS

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Posts
11,994
Reaction score
2,932
Location
MA
Ram Year
2023
Engine
3.3 tt
They finally gave us the 392.
Exactly!!!
I really like the 392 truck. I really, really like the SRT truck, but let's be realistic here,...I'm not gonna be able to afford that. Lots of people are not gonna be able to afford that. Even the 392 truck will be up there in price. I'm guessing 70 - 80k for a nicely optioned truck. Hopefully the 392 doesn't have MDS. (Cue in the MDS nut swingers. LOLZ)

**Definitely DO NOT want the side graphics though. I hope that's an option.
LOL
 

mikeru

Super Moderator
Staff member
Moderator Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2016
Posts
4,483
Reaction score
9,161
Location
Florida
Ram Year
2020 Limited
Engine
Hemi 5.7L non-Etorque

At about 14:50 he looks at the chassis without a body on it. You can see the suspension there, but I am not well versed enough to know what's samey-same with this air suspension vs the "normal" one. The video guy never talks about it, either.

Brake venting is smart, though, that's something they had to figure out on the early police package Chargers because brake fade was really bad on them.

The spindles look differant,but to my eyes the upper and lower control arms look alot like what the 5th Gens use.They could shove the tires out with a differant spindle offset,which would also probably give them a better set-up to fit the big brakes onto the front

It looks very similar to the air suspension on my Limited, but in a video it's hard to tell if they are the same components or not.
 

Mojo88

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2024
Posts
725
Reaction score
1,887
Location
Rhode Island
Ram Year
'19 Longhorn Gen5 ORG
Engine
Hemi 5.7L non-eTorque
Those look bad@$$. I'd be all over one of the supercharged one's if they were going to be south of $90k

Gotta be North of $100k is my guess.

Think that's bad? Take a peek at a new Shelby Ford F150, they 'start' at $139,995!
 

Attachments

  • Shelby-F150.jpg
    Shelby-F150.jpg
    150 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:

Mojo88

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2024
Posts
725
Reaction score
1,887
Location
Rhode Island
Ram Year
'19 Longhorn Gen5 ORG
Engine
Hemi 5.7L non-eTorque
Exactly!!!
I really like the 392 truck. I really, really like the SRT truck, but let's be realistic here,...I'm not gonna be able to afford that. Lots of people are not gonna be able to afford that. Even the 392 truck will be up there in price. I'm guessing 70 - 80k for a nicely optioned truck. Hopefully the 392 doesn't have MDS. (Cue in the MDS nut swingers. LOLZ)

**Definitely DO NOT want the side graphics though. I hope that's an option.
LOL

Totally concur. That red was the one for me (exterior looks-wise). Horrid graphic, otherwise all else is spot on. Interior is just so-so. It'll be interesting to see what different options are available for colors, wheels, interiors and all the other goodies.......
 

Wild one

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Posts
23,817
Reaction score
54,823
Ram Year
14 Sport
Engine
5.7
Hopefully the 392 doesn't have MDS. (Cue in the MDS nut swingers. LOLZ)
Highly doubt the 392 will be MDS deleted,as they only make the 5.7 / 6.4 6 speed Challengers and Hellcats as MDS delete.These are all automatics so i'm guessing only the SRT version with the Hellcats 6.2 will be MDS delete.
It'd be nice if both the 5.7 and 6.4 versions were factory MDS deleted,but i think the odds of that happening are mighty long odds
 
Back
Top