Synthetic Oil

Oil of Choice

  • Castrol Syntec/Edge

    Votes: 254 8.4%
  • Royal Purple

    Votes: 344 11.4%
  • AMSOil

    Votes: 428 14.2%
  • Valvoline Synpower

    Votes: 174 5.8%
  • Mobil 1

    Votes: 1,077 35.7%
  • Other

    Votes: 737 24.5%

  • Total voters
    3,014

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Travis8352

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Posts
1,972
Reaction score
4,657
Location
Houghton michigan
Ram Year
2018
Engine
5.7 hemi
Boron levels all over the board on redline 5w30, and my sample which killed tick was at 20ppm. So now we need to have white paper like we do on moly to gauge.

But that test while not a smoking gun hints boron is killer, and I need to go back they did have different levels and even low levels were good.
It does deplete over an OCI so perhaps it was higher? It does seem all over the map but i guess we know its always in there. HPL is low boron like 80ppm tops IIRC. Except for their mid saps euro line that one has 500ppm boron but no moly.
 

Travis8352

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Posts
1,972
Reaction score
4,657
Location
Houghton michigan
Ram Year
2018
Engine
5.7 hemi
I think Brian knows that, he is asking if the properties are similar as in EP. Sounds like they are! We need a boron additive for hemi tick?

Boron is the new thing that is for sure, and manu's falling in love with moly again.
Also yeah i totally misunderstood him and didnt realize till you posted this lol
 

tjfdesmo

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Posts
2,864
Reaction score
5,585
Location
AZ
We will see what happens. I think these engines are coming for 2027 models. Who knows maybe they will go dohc
I hear it will be "Vorteculistic Tri Cam", one in the block runs all the intakes, and one each overhead for exhausts...
 

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
9,618
Reaction score
25,257
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
Honestly this seems to be about as universal of an oil as there is! It doesnt have an API donut but mobil says it passes SP engine tests so it doesnt meet SP but its good for LSPI despite having 1700ppm calcium. Loaded with top euro approvals to including mb229.52 which has an LSPI test

I read some more at Bob's and got agitated at all the hatred and infighting, so quit.

They seem puzzled by this oil as much as we are, without concern for the Hemi engine, even. They're rambling on quite a bit about the new Valvoline Restore and Protect which, by all accounts, works. But I still don't know that it is the best LUBRICANT for our applications. Sure, it CLEANS.

But I digress. Still looking for the more robust 30 wt (11-12 cSt @ 100C) that you can't get with API SP for pulling loads, high ambient temps, turbos, etc. So oil which is optimal for Hemi?

Red Line
HPL
Mobil 1 ESP?

I'm kind of deleting PUP from my list 'cause they went real low on 30 wt vis to meet API SP "fuel economy" :rolleyes: . Also now thinking 0W-30 all year non-API SP instead of 5W-30. I mean, why not? We're having to dump these oils ~ 5k miles anyway due to engine weaknesses (plugged galley orifices in Hemi engines from normal combustion contaminants so lifter rollers aren't starved, high soot and fuel dilution from GDI engines).
 

Burla

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Posts
27,748
Reaction score
58,202
Ram Year
2010 Hemi Reg Cab 4x4
Engine
Hemi
Because every cutting board needs an engine?

 

huntergreen

Senior Member
Marine Corps Navy Badge
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Posts
13,090
Reaction score
28,510
Ram Year
2016
Engine
hemi 5.7
Because every cutting board needs an engine?

Had something similar in the mid sixties. A glue together model with working parts. It came from Sears Christmas wish book.
 

Curmudgeon

Senior Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2017
Posts
1,602
Reaction score
4,855
Location
York, Pennsylvania
Ram Year
2014 1500 Laramie 4x4 QC, 3.21 rear, 8-speed
Engine
5.7L Hemi
Had something similar in the mid sixties. A glue together model with working parts. It came from Sears Christmas wish book.

I was just thinking about that. Wasn't it called The Visible V-8?
It would run on "D" cells but the block was clear plastic so although
I had to build it from the inside out I could also watch all the parts
move while the crank turned.

Wow, eBay!

https://www.ebay.com/itm/196919088145
 

huntergreen

Senior Member
Marine Corps Navy Badge
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Posts
13,090
Reaction score
28,510
Ram Year
2016
Engine
hemi 5.7
I was just thinking about that. Wasn't it called The Visible V-8?
It would run on "D" cells but the block was clear plastic so although
I had to build it from the inside out I could also watch all the parts
move while the crank turned.

Wow, eBay!

https://www.ebay.com/itm/196919088145
Exactly! My mother tossed it while I was in the navy.
 

Burla

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Posts
27,748
Reaction score
58,202
Ram Year
2010 Hemi Reg Cab 4x4
Engine
Hemi

Burla

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Posts
27,748
Reaction score
58,202
Ram Year
2010 Hemi Reg Cab 4x4
Engine
Hemi
It's not green which is the real fiasco. What happens when you burn anything except water? GPF take a harmless particle and coverts into a gas after the gpf burns it. A gas which the greenies said was a greenhouse gas only after the 2012 administration I wont mention the name, said it was. It's not like an oil filter, it doesn't capture it and put it back in the ground where it came from harmlessly, instead it burns it. Not directing this to any individual, just agreeing with Brian's point here. I am missing the point here other then Jay Pan, the only thing that makes sense is that they need auto dealership sales as a serious tax pool. Goal = the 50k miles engine, or more to the point, the 50k miles vehicle because the cost to fix exceeds the value of the vehicle. It's a rather bad joke they literally steal the value of our vehicles with this scheme. And the cost to the planet is a never ending cycle of mass production of vehicles when vehicles that last a 1/2 million miles would have been the better green goal?

Create an engine that produces more particulates, in order to give up 20 HP in order to burn said particulates, and say it is for the planet? Never a thought to the main issue with these engines, they have to be kept in pristine condition to operate. The GPF does nothing to advance that fact, it doesn't clean the engine or the air.

.
 

turkeybird56

Military Vet 1976-1996 Retired US Army
Air Force Army Law Enforcement
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Posts
25,924
Reaction score
56,736
Location
Central Texas
Ram Year
2019 Bighorn, 4 X 4, 3.21 rear, Bright Flame Red Pearl Coat, Mopar tonneau cover,Westin Bed rug
Engine
Hemi 5.7, Non E Torque
Well, if we all ditch our Hemis and get 4 cylinder turbo GDI's, all our Hemi problems will be history, no?
speak fer yerself !!!! :yucky::33::angels25:

I was seriously considering upgrading from my 2019, to a 2026 Hemi. They initially said there would be just VVT but when they showed up with the friggin E Junkola, that keeps me in my 2019. But my truck does have less than 28K on the odometer, so not like I need to be in a hurry, just wanted a new ride as I usually only do 5 years on a truck and I am already at 7.
 
Last edited:

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
9,618
Reaction score
25,257
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
speak fer yerself !!!! :yucky::33::angels25: I was seriously considering upgrading from my 2019, to a 2026 Hemi. They initially said there would be just VVT but when they showed up with the friggin E Junkola, that keeps me in my 2019. But my truck does have less than 28K on the odometer, so not like I need to be in a hurry, just wanted a new ride as I usually only do 5 years on a truck and I am already at 7.

Yeah, the least Kuniskis could have done is not FORCE eTorque on us. I mean, WTF? He says he listened to customers that want a V8. I don't see people clamoring for a 20 year old engine design back - we want a modern V8, but 'ol Sergio & Carlos milked Chrysler for profits so they didn't invest in a new V8 while Ford & GM did.

But he couldn't revive what we wanted. IDK, maybe EPA wouldn't let him based on eTorque test data mileage. Regardless, it's a non-starter for most of us. I guess just let what's left of the company die at this point. It would be well-earned.
 

HEMIMANN

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
Posts
9,618
Reaction score
25,257
Location
Minneapolis, MN
Ram Year
2017 2500 Laramie Crew Cab
Engine
6.4L HEMI
It's not green which is the real fiasco. What happens when you burn anything except water? GPF take a harmless particle and coverts into a gas after the gpf burns it. A gas which the greenies said was a greenhouse gas only after the 2012 administration I wont mention the name, said it was. It's not like an oil filter, it doesn't capture it and put it back in the ground where it came from harmlessly, instead it burns it. Not directing this to any individual, just agreeing with Brian's point here. I am missing the point here other then Jay Pan, the only thing that makes sense is that they need auto dealership sales as a serious tax pool. Goal = the 50k miles engine, or more to the point, the 50k miles vehicle because the cost to fix exceeds the value of the vehicle. It's a rather bad joke they literally steal the value of our vehicles with this scheme. And the cost to the planet is a never ending cycle of mass production of vehicles when vehicles that last a 1/2 million miles would have been the better green goal?

Create an engine that produces more particulates, in order to give up 20 HP in order to burn said particulates, and say it is for the planet? Never a thought to the main issue with these engines, they have to be kept in pristine condition to operate. The GPF does nothing to advance that fact, it doesn't clean the engine or the air.

.

You saying even with a GPF, GDI exhaust still puts out more particulates than SPFI without a GPF? OY!!!

What a GD mess of a powerplant!!! I was a convert to sequential port fuel injection after they finally perfected it (needed fast enough ECM and CANBUS). After fighting with carburetors for 30 years, I really liked the no-fuss reliability in all weather conditions. Although Chrysler screwed theirs up by only having their software programmed to -20F or something. I remember a guy at work getting towed to warm his engine up ha ha.

But the more you read about GDI and how Mitsubishi misled the entire industry in being first to market in the 90's, the more pi$$ed off I get.
 
Back
Top