olyelr
Senior Member
Yes, most do
Gotchya. Well, so monitor the suction line and then monitor the return line. Subtract the return line from the suction line and boom, gallons used hahahahah.
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
Yes, most do
Have yall seen the new tfl trucks video of the new power wagon?
2017 power wagon got like 13.2 mpg
New 2019 power wagon got 16.5 mpg
Seems like the 8 speed is making a big difference. I bet some guys on flat land at sea level may hit close to 20 on the highway.
No I didn't see that. Can you please post a link?
The only one I saw with that kind of mileage was the Rebel 1500.
It's on their site in a video. They did a head to head of the new power wagon vs rebel.No I didn't see that. Can you please post a link?
The only one I saw with that kind of mileage was the Rebel 1500.
How would you go about....... oh never mind.
WGAF - I don't..I bought it, I own it, I gotta feed it when it's thirsty no matter how much it drinks. Just like my spouse, when she get's thirsty, have to feed her good whiskey...Some things you can't worry about cost
of ownership, just level of enjoyment.................
I will add that the computers fuel algorithm is only as good as the sensors giving it the data. Not all sensors are dead nuts accurate or read exactly the same. You can have two sensors side by side, and both may be slightly off depending on which side of the bell curve they are on. Contamination on a sensor or slight leaks in the intake/exhaust may also play a role.
I don't GAF either about my fuel mileage my truck gets either as I stated several posts back and through various posts in this forum. Obviously the guy with over 10k worth of mods on his truck is not too concerned about fuel mileage or cost of ownership and is more concerned about enjoying his vehicle.
I was just trying to explain how computing fuel mileage is not as simple as it seems. Is this a discussion we are not allowed to have? Don't want anyone to get triggered.
^^^^ This
Every one of those sensors and calcs has a margin of error even before wear and tear from usage comes into play......combine that whole series of variables with +/- and you end up with some noise in your numbers. Some manufacturers do better than others with this, some probably based on purposeful choices and others via "success by coincidence" through some luck in how their complete sensor loop plays together.
But what is odd, though, is pretty much all the manufacturers computer readouts show more mpg then actual. What a coincidence.
We were speaking about the reason why some computers are more accurate than others. Like when most people here say their EVIC is over 1.5 mpg off, but you will have a few that will say theirs is less than 1 mpg off. This is likely due to the quality of sensors used and the allowable bell curve from the manufacturer.
Which brings up another thought in my mind.
Everyone compares the evic to the “actual” mpg when hand calculating. BUT, in reality how actual is the hand calculation? Did you just fill the tank to the exact same level as when the you reset the trip? Probly not. Or did you actually just put in 26.34 gallons, or is that off too and it was actually 25.93 gallons.
I guess the truth is there are just too many variables and fudge factors to **** with the numbers.
Yep, way too many variables even with hand calculations to be dead nuts exact. I would probably not even keep records of my truck if it wasn't for tax reasons when I use the truck for farm use.
Although the aCar app makes it really easy to track. All you do is enter current mileage along with a few other things, and it gives you detailed statistics with graphs and charts that can be sent to Excel. It even automatically syncs with my Fuelly account.
OH C'MON!!!!!!!!!!!
Thats impressive.
Only claimable in Montana and Wyoming.Now that works.